Conference Agenda
The sessions of the sections are highlighted in blue, those of the mini-symposia in yellow.
Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. If you click the selected day again, you return to the agenda overview.
You can also filter by sections or mini-symposia (topics). Please select a single session for detailed view with abstracts.
As participant you can create your own personal agenda. To do so, log into your account first. Then go to the agenda and click on the plus symbol to add sessions to your personal agenda.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||
HPM3: History and Philosophy of Mathematics
| ||
| Presentations | ||
How Gustav Roch (1839–1866) formulated and proved the Riemann-Roch Theorem without the explicit use of divisors or cohomology spaces Universität Koblenz, Germany On the one hand, the year 2026 marks the bicentenary of the birth of Bernhard Riemann (1826–1866); on the other hand, this anniversary has been–and continues to be–commemorated on numerous other occasions. Consequently, the present contribution is devoted not exclusively to Riemann, but also to a mathematician who was closely associated with him–particularly through the naming of a significant theorem. On the question of priority on large coverings: Stefan Mandel´s combinatorial condensation and the lottery problem Private Researcher, Germany Stefan Mandel has won the lottery 14 times. He never disclosed the recipe he called combinatorial condensation, which enabled him to hit the Romanian lottery jackpot in the early phase of his betting career. Combinatorial condensation is frequently mixed up with another strategy known as buying the pot, which Stefan Mandel was pursuing later on. On occasion, he dropped a few hints on combinatorial condensation. The hints are applied in this presentation to narrow down and assess his initial recipe. The underlying theory resembles what a weekend mathematician, as he once referred to himself, may have encountered in the 1960s. The size of actual covering designs and the associated efforts allow the following hypothesis: Stefan Mandel most likely pioneered in constructing a (15, 6, 5) covering design with paper and pencil many years before researchers modeled such topics on computers and published about it. Calculations indicate that he took considerable risks that his method might fail: he didn't fully utilize all the lottery numbers, but limited himself to a subset. The risks explain why he later changed his strategy from combinatorial condensation to buying the pot. Waltraud Voss (TU Dresden): Graphs and Networks and a New Perspective on the World TU Dresden, Germany With developments in science, business and society - which have also led to the "renaissance of the mathematics of discrete structures" (Sachs) - our world has increasingly come to be perceived once again as a "vast network". The "distributed system" can serve as a paradigm for this perspective. A distributed system is characterized by "distributed processes" that are "temporarily" parallel (concurrent, independent of one another) but nevertheless "communicate" with others in a certain way. Network planning takes into account the parallelism of processes in scheduling; game-theoretical and cybernetic considerations also assume temporary concurrency of communicating processes. However, a unifying theoretical approach was not provided until 1962 by Carl Adam Petri (1926-2010). Processes occurring in the discrete dynamic system to be modeled can be traced in the network (later named after Petri) as a sequence of transitions. The causal structure is evident from the Petri net. Since the early 1980s, Petri nets have become firmly established in all highly industrialized countries, include the GDR. | ||



