Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 18th Apr 2026, 04:03:01pm CEST
|
Agenda Overview |
| Session | ||
D316: EXPLORING GEOMETRY FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
| ||
| Presentations | ||
Design for AM: the impact of the shell feature on the residual stress in directed energy deposition components University of Bristol, United Kingdom Residual stress is inherent in Additive Manufacturing process due to the heat cycling of the material being deposited on the build plate. The manufacturing toolpath can have a considerable effect on the development of residual stress distribution within a component. This paper examines the impact of the shell feature to generate some design heuristics on whether to include it when residual stress is of concern. The stress feature did increase the residual stressed observed during printing but was mitigated by the cooling regime after the process was complete. Geometry-based estimation of manufacturing complexity of fused filament fabrication printed products University of Bayreuth, Germany We present a geometry-based complexity factor for additive manufacturing that estimates relative printing effort of fused filament fabricated parts from STL geometry alone. A reference effort is derived by slicing thousands of parts and volume-equivalent cubes. Eight interpretable geometric metrics feed a constrained, regularised index with monotonic calibration, achieving robust test accuracy and revealing which shape features dominate structural complexity. Automation of part preparation for PBF-LB/M–based additive repair of turbine blades 1Institute of Product Development (IPeG), Leibniz University Hannover, Germany; 2MTU Maintenance Hannover GmbH, Germany Turbine blades are high-value components whose replacement is costly and slow, increasing the demand for effective repair strategies. Although PBF-LB/M supports precise additive repair, its application is limited by manual and time-intensive part preparation. This work introduces an automated digital workflow for cutting plane definition, repair geometry reconstruction and part alignment, improving reproducibility and reducing preparation time in PBF-LB/M-based turbine blade repair. | ||

