Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

 
 
Session Overview
Session
Room D: CFG 3
Time:
Friday, 26/Mar/2021:
2:00pm - 3:20pm

Session Chair: Sebastian Gryglewicz, Erasmus University Rotterdam

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations

Personal Taxes and Corporate Cash Holdings

Jens Dick-Nielsen, Kristian Miltersen, Ramona Westermann

Copenhagen Business School, Denmark

Discussant: Sebastian Gryglewicz (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

Dividends are taxed at the personal level, but injecting funds into firms does not offer the symmetric tax bene t. Hence, there is a personal tax saving incentive to retain cash in the firm. We develop a corporate finance model of liquidity management, in which the firm's liquidity policy trades off precaution and saved personal taxes against agency and corporate tax costs. The model implies that the tax saving motive is substantial and increasing with the dividend tax rate. Consistent with the model, we show empirically that, after the 2003 dividend tax cut, firms with taxable investors reduced their cash accumulation.



Direct democracy, corporate political strategy, and firm value

Ruediger Fahlenbrach1,2, Alexei Ovtchinnikov3, Philip Valta4

1Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; 2Swiss Finance Institute; 3HEC Paris; 4University of Bern

Discussant: Felix Meschke (University of Kansas)

We analyze a novel data set of corporate contributions to ballot initiatives and referendums at the U.S. state level between 2003 and 2018. Ballot initiatives and referendums allow citizens of 26 U.S. states to vote directly on legislation. Firms make significant contributions to ballot measure committees in favor of or against specific initiatives that exceed on average their political action committee contributions. Firms that contribute to successful (failed) direct initiated state initiatives generate positive (negative) CARs of 0.32% (-0.21%) on average around the election. They also experience significant sales growth in the two years surrounding successful ballot measure campaigns.



 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: SGF Conference 2021
Conference Software - ConfTool Pro 2.6.142+TC+CC
© 2001 - 2021 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany