Poster-Exhibition
Location: Future Aviation Lab & 6th Floor
Integrated geological and 2D electrical resistivity tomography for assessment of geothermal potential in Dilla area, Southern Ethiopian Main Rift
Getnet Assefa1, Tariku Takele1, Tariku Degife2, Demise Tadessa1, Amare Kassie3, Abebayehu Tadesse1, Asaye Getenet4
1: Department of Geology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Dilla University, P.O. Box 419, Dilla, Ethiopia;
2: Department of Geology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Arba Minch University, P.O. Box 21, Arba Minch, Ethiopia;
3: Department of Geology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Debre Markos University, P.O. Box 269, Debre Markos, Ethiopia;
4: Department of Geology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Woldia University, P.O. Box 400, Woldia, Ethiopia
Ist mitteltiefe / tiefe Geothermie in Insel- und Küstengebieten der Nordsee realisierbar? - Fazit aus der Studie Norderney
Laureen Benoit, Michael Kettermann, Olga Knaub, Gregor Bussmann
Fraunhofer IEG, Fraunhofer-Einrichtung für Energieinfrastrukturen und Geotechnologien IEG
Daten sind der Schlüssel: wie Bohrungssteckbriefe zur Minimierung von Bohrrisiken beitragen können
Michael Drews1, Julian Breitsameter1, Indira Shatyrbayeva1, Johannes Großmann2
1: Technische Universität München, Deutschland;
2: Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Deutschland
Neue Erkenntnisse aus der Seismik Niederrhein für die geothermische Exploration in Straelen
Michael Kettermann1, Oliver Ritzmann1, Florian Wellmann1,2
1: Fraunhofer IEG, Deutschland;
2: CG3, RWTH Aachen University
H3 Hexagonal GIS Model for Prospect Analysis of Deep Geothermal Exploration in Thurgau, Switzerland
A B M Ariful Bari Khandaker1, Ezgi Satiroglu1, Christin Bobe1, Florian Wellmann1,2
1: Institute of Computational Geoscience, Geothermics and Reservoir Geophysics (CG3), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, 52074, Germany;
2: Fraunhofer Research Institution for Energy Infrastructures and Geothermal Systems (IEG), Bochum, 44801, Germany
Optimizing Geothermal Carbonate Reservoir Exploration by Integrating Forward Stratigraphic and Diagenetic Modelling with Machine Learning: The ProGRes Project
Sven Maerz1, Gerd Winterleitner1, Jan Niederau1, Nadezda Meier1, Guido Blöcher2,4, Deyan Tian2, Christian Siever-Wenzlaff3, Alexander Meeder3, David Bruhn1,5
1: Fraunhofer IEG, Fraunhofer Research Institution for Energy Infrastructures and Geotechnologies, IEG;
2: GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.3: Geoenergy, Telegrafenberg, 14473, Potsdam, Germany;
3: GASAG Solution Plus;
4: Department of Engineering Geology, Technical University of Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Germany;
5: Faculty of Civil Engineerging and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology
Near-Surface Geophysical Investigations for Geothermal Exploration near Wörth am Rhein
Johannes Mair, Andreas Henk
TU Darmstadt, Deutschland
Geothermal potential assessment of the Bare-Bakem locality (Cameroon Volcanic line): contributions from geophysical and geothermometric studies
Ange Merveille Meguedong Guedia, Dieudonné Bisso, Yem Mbida, Serges Koah
University of Yaoundé 1, Cameroon
Uncertainty-Aware 3D Geological Modeling of the Osteifel Region using GemPy within the DEGREE Project
Atefeh Rahimi1, Jan von Harten1, Florian Wellmann1,2
1: Computational Geoscience, Geohtermics and Reservoir Geophysics (CG3), RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany;
2: Fraunhofer Research Institution for Energy Infrastructures and Geotechnologies (IEG), 52062 Aachen, Germany
The WärmeGut Project: Development and Integration of a Thermal Response Test (TRT) Database for Shallow Geothermal Applications
Mehrdad Sardar Abadi1, Thorsten Agemar1, Tom Schintgen1, Inga Moeck1,2
1: LIAG Institute for Applied Geophysics, Stilleweg 2, 30655, Hannover, Germany;
2: Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Goldschmidtstr. 3, 37077, Göttingen, Germany
A modular workbench for geological modeling: Insights from the Weisweiler geothermal exploration site
Jan von Harten1, Jan Niederau2, Alexander Lüpges3, Marzieh Baes4, Mauro Cacace4, Bernhard Rumpe3, Florian Wellmann1,2
1: Chair of Computational Geoscience, Geothermics and Reservoir Geophysics, RWTH Aachen University, Germany;
2: Fraunhofer IEG, Fraunhofer Research Institution for Energy Infrastructuresand Geothermal Systems IEG, Germany;
3: Chair of Software Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Germany;
4: Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Germany
Untersuchung des mitteltiefen geothermischen Potentials verschiedener Standorte im Oberrheingraben mit Hilfe von COMSOL
Leandra Weydt1, Johann Holler1, Naga Lokesh Gunturu Venkata2, Bastian Welsch2
1: Angewandte Geothermie, Institut für Angewandte Geowissenschaften, TU Darmstadt;
2: Fachbereich Bau- und Umweltingenieurwesen, Hochschule Bochum
AMPEDEK: Atlas geochemischer, petrophysikalischer und felsmechanischer Gesteinskennwerte des kristallinen Grundgebirges in Deutschland
Leandra Weydt1, Ángel Ramírez1, Ingo Sass1,2
1: TU Darmstadt, Deutschland;
2: GFZ Potsdam
Prozess-basierte Modellierung von synsedimentären Störungen in Karbonaten
Gerd Winterleitner, Nadezda Meier, Sven Maerz, Jan Niederau, David Bruhn
Fraunhofer IEG, Fraunhofer-Einrichtung für Energieinfrastrukturen und Geotechnologien
Anwendung von Bohrtechnologien in Geothermiebohrungen in den letzten 15 Jahren - Drilling technology applications in Geothermal Wells during the last 15 years
Franck Kuinkeu Tchouta, Jose Campo-Redondo, Cristian Scanzoni
Kemco GmbH, Germany
Anwendung von Bohrtechnologien in Geothermiebohrungen in den letzten 15 Jahren - Drilling technology applications in Geothermal Wells during the last 15 years.
Franck Kuinkeu Tchouta, Jose Campo-Redondo, Cristian Scanzoni, Julio Kemenyfy
Kemco GmbH, Germany
From Planning to Real-Time: Digital Integration of Drilling Hydraulics Simulation into Real-Time Operations via Web-Based Tools
Wisam Sindi1, Christoph Aublinger2
1: Sindi Digital Energy Technologies UG (haftungsbeschränkt), Germany;
2: Oilfield Data Engineering GmbH, Switzerland
Developments in Swellable Elastomeric Technologies for Isolation in Deep and Medium-Deep Geothermal Applications.
Phil Stone
Reactive Downhole Tools, United Kingdom
Bridging Geological Modeling and Process Simulation: Mesh Generation in the WBGeo Workbench
Marzieh Baes1, Mauro Cacace1, Jan von Harten2, Alexander Lüpges3, Denise Degen1,4, Jan Niederau5, Tobias Rolf5, Magdalena Scheck-Wenderoth1,6, Florian Wellmann2, Nora Koltzer5, Simon Virgo7, Bernhard Rumpe3
1: Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences;
2: Chair of Computational Geoscience, Geothermics and Reservoir Geophysics, RWTH Aachen University;
3: Software Engineering Department of Computer Science, RWTH Aachen University;
4: Institute of Applied Geosciences, TU Darmstadt;
5: Fraunhofer IEG, Fraunhofer Research Institution for Energy Infrastructures and Geotechnologies IEG;
6: Sediment Basins and Georesources, TU Berlin;
7: Terranigma Solutions GmbH
From Borehole to Bedrock: Unlocking Subsurface Insight for Shallow Geothermal Design with the power of AI
Christie Capper, Sebastian Weida
Deep Earth, Germany
The Role of Fracture Networks and Stochastic Modeling in Advancing Geothermal Research at GeoLaB
Ali Dashti, Jens Carsten Grimmer, Thomas Kohl
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Deep geothermal ground heat exchanger in salt structures - a contribution to the heat transition in northern Germany
Renee M. Dubberke1, Kim G. Maver2, Tom Trittin3, Reinhard Kirsch4, Sebastian Bauer1
1: Institut für Geowissenschaften, Universität Kiel, Deutschland;
2: Green Therma, Dänemark;
3: Stadtwerke Flensburg, Deutschland;
4: GeoImpuls, Deutschland
Single-well push-pull design options for tracer tests at geothermal production holes: some caveats, and tracer slug sizing considerations
Julia Ghergut1, Horst Behrens1,2, Bettina Wiegand1, Working Group GFK-Monitor1,2
1: Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Deutschland;
2: Projektconsortium GFK-Monitor (federführend: TU München)
Geothermie in einem Heilquellenschutzgebiet
Olga Knaub1, Nora Koltzer1, Michael Kettermann1, Celestine Kumlehn2
1: Fraunhofer IEG, Deutschland;
2: Stadt Bad Oeynhausen
Thermo-hydro-mechanical simulation of heat extraction from geothermal systems using CO2-water two phase fluid
Saeed Mahmoodpour, Michael Drews
Technical University of Munich, Germany
Can I assist you? Machine-learning-supported derivation of calibration parameters for forward modelling
Jan Niederau1, Sahar Sadrikhanloo1, Eva De Boever2, Mette Olivarius3, Sven Maerz1, Stefan Carpentier2
1: Fraunhofer IEG, Fraunhofer Research Institution for Energy Infrastructures and Geotechnologies, IEG, Germany;
2: TNO – Geological Survey of the Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands;
3: Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Copenhagen, Denmark
3-D Geological Modeling from Legacy Seismic Data with Consideration of Uncertainties
Daniel Satizabal1, Ítalo Gonçalves2, Jan von Harten1, David Nathan1, Florian Wellmann1,3
1: Chair of Computational Geoscience, Geothermics and Reservoir Geophysics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, 52074, Germany;
2: Geological Modeling Laboratory, Federal University of Pampa, Caçapava do Sul, RS, Brazil;
3: Fraunhofer Research Institution for Energy Infrastructures and Geothermal Systems (IEG), Bochum, 44801, Germany
THMC-coupled modelling of diagenetic evolution and geothermal reservoir simulation in the Muschelkalk Formation of the North German Basin.
Deyan Tian1, Guido Blöcher1,4, Ben Norden1, Sven Maerz2, Gerd Winterleitner2, Jan Niederau2, Meier Nadezda2, Christian Siever-Wenzlaff3, Alexander Meeder3, David Bruhn2,5
1: Helmholtz Center Potsdam GFZ German Research Center for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam, 14473, Brandenburg, Germany;
2: Fraunhofer IEG, Fraunhofer Research Institution for Energy Infrastructures and Geotechnologies, IEG, Gulbener Straße 23 03046 Cottbus, Germany;
3: GASAG Solution Plus GmbH (GSP) EUREF-Campus 23–24 10829 Berlin, Germany;
4: Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, Berlin, 10623, Berlin, Germany;
5: Faculty of Civil Engineerging and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology
High-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage for flexible, low-carbon district heating: a numerical study from the German Molasse Basin
Kalliopi Tzoufka1, Kevin Bock2, Guido Blöcher3,4, Laura Lehmann2, Clemens Felsmann2, Kai Zosseder1
1: Technical University of Munich, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Geothermal Energy Group, Munich, Germany;
2: Technical University of Dresden, Institute of Power Engineering, Chair of Building Energy Systems and Heat Supply, Dresden, Germany;
3: GFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.3 Geoenergy, Potsdam, Germany;
4: Technical University of Berlin, Department of Engineering Geology, Berlin, Germany
Echtzeitsimulation geochemischer Prozesse in geothermischen Kraftwerken
Lars Helge Yström1, Michael Trumpp1, Johannes Amtmann2, Florian Eichinger3, Daniel Winter4, Joachim Koschikowski4, Fabian Nitschke1
1: Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Deutschland;
2: Geosaic GmbH, Österreich;
3: Hydroisotop GmbH, Deutschland;
4: Fraunhofer Institut für Solare Energiesysteme ISE, Deutschland
Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing from GeoLaB1 well: cementation and drilling monitoring
Jérôme Azzola, Emmanuel Gaucher
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Applied Geosciences, Geothermal Energy and Reservoir Technology
Relative Moment Tensor Analysis of the St1 Deep Heat Enhanced Geothermal System, Finland
Wasja Bloch1, Volker Oye1, Doriane Drolet2, Michael Bostock2, Alexandre Plourde3, Grzegorz Kwiatek4
1: NORSAR, Norway;
2: The University of British Columbia, Canada;
3: Natural Resources Canada, Canada;
4: Gesellschaft für Materialprüfung und Geophysik, Germany
Geothermal activities at the KTB deep crustal lab, Windischeschenbach, Germany
Carolin Böse, Jochem Kück, Said Kamrani, Günter Zimmermann, Georg Dresen, Marco Bohnhoff, Ingo Sass
GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Deutschland
Thermo-economic assessment of reversible high-temperature heat pumps / Organic Rankine Cycles for geothermal CHP plants
Florian Kaufmann, Arianna Passamonti, Hartmut Spliethoff, Christopher Schifflechner
Technical University of Munich
Innovative thermisch angetriebene Wärmepumpenverfahren zur Nutzung von Tiefengeothermie für die Prozesswärmeversorgung in der Industrie
Sven Klute, Marcus Budt
Fraunhofer Institut für Umwelt-, Sicherheits- und Energietechnik UMSICHT, Deutschland
Locating subsurface fibre optic cables using remote earthquakes: A prerequisite for monitoring induced seismicity with existing “dark” fibres
Fabian Limberger, Abolfazl Komeazi, Georg Rümpker
Institute of Geosciences, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Deutschland
Frictional properties of fault gouges in the Upper Rhine Graben: Implications for induced seismicity
Tesfay Kiros Mebrahtu1, Michael Rudolf1, André Niemeijer2, Andreas Henk1
1: Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Angewandte Geowissenschaften, Darmstadt, Germany;
2: Department of Geoscience, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Geothermie – und jetzt? Der Weg vom Reservoir zur Wärmeversorgung
Mitja Friesen
Logstor Deutschland GmbH, Deutschland
Alternative Rohr- und Verlegesysteme für den wirtschaftlichen Ausbau geothermiebasierter Wärmenetze
Markus Schedel1, Hung Pham1, Matthias Krusemark1, Lukas Seib1, Ingo Sass1,2
1: Technische Universität Darmstadt, Angewandte Geothermie;
2: GFZ Helmholtz-Zentrum für Geoforschung, Sektion 4.3 Geoenergie
Mine-based geothermal study in a burning coalfield of India
Anupal Jyoti Dutta1, Debasis Deb2, Sandeep D. Kulkarni3
1: Deysarkar Centre of Excellence in Petroleum Engineering,Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India;
2: Department of Mining Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India;
3: Deysarkar Centre of Excellence in Petroleum Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India
Neue Wege in die Geothermie eröffnen
Oliver Buschor
separatus AG, Schweiz
Erdwärmesondenfelder als integraler Bestandteil nachhaltiger Wärmeversorgungssysteme – Technische Potenziale bei Bau und Betrieb
Rolf Wagner
BLZ Geotechnik GmbH, Deutschland
Findings from the operation of a cold grid with multi-source regeneration of the borehole heat exchanger field
Xenia Kirschstein1, Joscha Reber1, Anna-Lena Fiedler2, Clemens Hübler1
1: Energy Efficient Construction, Institute of Structural Mechanics and Design, Technical University of Darmstadt;
2: Institute for Housing and Environment (IWU), Darmstadt, Germany
Supporting the rollout of 5GDHC networks in the Alpine Space region: Insights into the Interreg project ALPHA
Aaron Wesemann1, Daiana Vacar2, Mathieu Audollent2, Gerhard Bayer3, Christopher Schifflechner1
1: Technical University of Munich, Deutschland;
2: CCI Nice Côte d'Azur;
3: ÖGUT - Österreichische Gesellschaft für Umwelt und Technik
Ermittlung von Optimierungspotenzial bei TRT-Geräten durch das emulierte Erdwärmesonden-Bauwerk (E-EWS)
Hanne Karrer, Peter Osgyan, Leonie Schurr, Lars Staudacher
ZAE Bayern, Deutschland
Integrating Temperature and Part-Load Dependent COP in Shallow Geothermal Borefield Design
Wouter Peere
Enead BV, Belgium
Modellierung der Wärmeleitfähigkeitsverteilung im Untergrund als wichtiger Parameter für die Berechnung des Potenzials der Oberflächennahen Geothermie in Deutschland
Tom Schintgen1, Thorsten Agemar1, Muhammad Anees1, Björn Holstein1, Michael Dussel2, Domenico Ravidà2, Inga Moeck1,2
1: LIAG-Institut für Angewandte Geophysik, Deutschland;
2: Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Deutschland
The interplay of global warming and groundwater recharge trends on the shallow thermal field in the North German Basin
Michael Tsypin1,2, Viet Dung Nguyen1, Mauro Cacace1, Guido Blöcher1,2, Magdalena Scheck-Wenderoth1,2
1: GFZ, Potsdam;
2: Technische Universität Berlin
Wärmeleitfähigkeit im Lockergestein - alles andere als eine Konstante
Markus Uhlig
Technische Universität Dresden, Deutschland
Geothermie - neu gedacht
Kurt Gergen, Edwin Kohl
GERGEN Energietechnik, Deutschland
PUSH-IT: Innovative Solutions for Decarbonising Heating Systems through High-Temperature Energy Storage
Nadezda Meier1, David Bruhn1,2, Martin Bloemendal2,3, Phil Vardon2, Iain Soutar4, Serge Santoo5
1: Fraunhofer-Einrichtung für Energieinfrastrukturen und Geothermie IEG, Deutschland;
2: Delft University of Technology, Netherlandsdavid.bruhn@ieg;
3: TNO, Dutch geological survey, Netherlands;
4: University of Exeter, England;
5: Polycentric Solutions B.V., Netherlands
Thermal energy storage and extraction at the MTES real laboratory site Reiche Zeche: microbial response and implications
Julia Mitzscherling1, Leonie Gabler2, Lukas Oppelt3, Rebekka Wiedener2, Alireza Arab2, Traugott Scheytt2, Dirk Wagner1,4
1: GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Section Geomicrobiology, 14473 Potsdam, Germany;
2: TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Chair of Hydrogeology and Hydrochemistry, 09599 Freiberg, Germany;
3: TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Professorship for Technical Thermodynamics, 09599 Freiberg, Germany;
4: University of Potsdam, Institute for Geosciences, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
Piloting High-Temperature Borehole Thermal Energy Storage: Progress from the PUSH-IT Project at TU Darmstadt
Hung Pham1, Markus Schedel1, Matthias Krusemark1, Max Ohagen1, Lukas Seib1, Ingo Sass1,2
1: Technical University of Darmstadt, Institute of Applied Geosciences, Geothermal Science and Technology;
2: The GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam
Geologischer Eis-Wärme-Speicher (GEWS) zur Wärmeversorgung (Kühlen und Heizen) - Betriebserfahrungen und Umweltauswirkungen
Götz Hornbruch1, Klas Lüders1, Ralf Köber1, Kerstin Meier zu Beerentrup1, Markus Ebert1, Stefan Heldt1, Johannes Nordbeck1, Matthias Walder1, Moritz Seest2, Sebastian Bauer1, Bernd Schwarzfeld3, Carsten Vogt2, Ulrike Werban2, Andreas Dahmke1
1: Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Deutschland;
2: Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung GmbH – UFZ;
3: BZE Ökoplan Büro für zeitgemäße Energieanwendung
BEW-Machbarkeitsstudien im östlichen Ruhrgebiet
Kevin Mannke, Florian Hahn, Roman Ignacy, Alexander Nikolov, Holger Born, Jonas Enno Lehmann
Fraunhofer IEG, Deutschland
GeotIS – Das Geothermische Informationssystem für Alle(s)
Alex Susan Meyer1, Thorsten Agemar1, Tom Schintgen1, Inga Moeck1,2
1: LIAG-Institut für Angewandte Geophysik, Deutschland;
2: Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Erstberatung bei der Planung und Umsetzung von Geothermieprojekten: Open-Source Tools zur thermo-ökonomischen Bewertung von Fernwärmenetzen und Großwärmepumpen
Ulrich Steiner1, Ludwig Irrgang2, Christopher Schifflechner2, Benedikt Schweiger2
1: Koordinationsstelle Tiefengeothermie Bayern, TUMInt Energy Research GmbH;
2: Technische Universität München
Berlin as a Front Runner in Large-Scale Geothermal Transformation?
Henning von Zanthier
VON ZANTHIER & DACHOWSKI, Deutschland
Enhancing Well Reuse for Geothermal Energy in Europe - Reducing Economic and Policy Barriers in the TRANSGEO Project
Julie Friddell1, Hannes Hofmann1, Ema Novak2, Sabine Appelt3, Klára Bödi4, Balázs Borkovits5, Jacques Brives6, Catarina Castro5, Werner Donke3, Ferenc Fedor5, Monika Hölzel6, Nina Kovač7, János Kovács5, Tomislav Kurevija8, Marija Macenić8, Katarina Marojević8, György Márton9, Matej Prkič7, Judit Schäffer9, Katrin Sieron10, Max Svetina11, Alen Višnjić2, Franz Vogel11, Bojan Vogrinčič7, Danijela Vrtarić2
1: GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Germany;
2: Medjimurje Energy Agency Ltd. (MENEA);
3: Greenwell Energy GmbH;
4: Mining Property Utilization Nonprofit Public Ltd. (BVH);
5: University of Pécs;
6: GeoSphere Austria (GSA);
7: Local Energy Agency Pomurje (LEAP);
8: University of Zagreb - Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering;
9: CROST Regional Development Nonprofit Ltd.;
10: State Office for Mining, Geology and Raw Material of Brandenburg (LBGR);
11: ONEO GmbH
Von der Machbarkeitsstudie zum (Geothermie-) Heizkraftwerk – vergabe- und vertragsrechtliche Fragen der 3D-Seismik, der Bohrung und des Anlagenbaus
Daniel Naumann
Luther Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, Deutschland
Wie macht Kommunikation die Energiewende schneller? Aktuelle Ansätze im Akzeptanzdialog
Andreas Bachmeier
Engel & Zimmermann GmbH, Deutschland
|
