Fostering the future of finance
through conversations and collaborations
between academics and practitioners.
Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
|
Daily Overview |
| Date: Tuesday, 26/Aug/2025 | |
| 9:00am - 9:30am | Session 1.01: Panel: "Fintech ecosystems around the world" Location: Aida Conference hall Moderator: Aadil Bundeally, BABL AI, Valutico & AI Risk, United Kingdom Panelist: Yuki Kishi, Fintech Association of Japan, Japan Panelist: Sebastian Schäfer, House of Finance and Tech Berlin, Germany Panelist: Marius Skuodis, Bank of Lithuania, Lithuania |
| 9:00am - 9:30am | Session 2.01: What Do Early Stage Investors Ask? An LLM Analysis of Expert Calls Location: Carmen Conference hall |
|
|
What Do Early Stage Investors Ask? An LLM Analysis of Expert Calls 1: University of Michigan, United States of America; 2: Ohio State University, United States of America We analyze how early-stage investors evaluate potential investments by using ChatGPT to analyze 5,143 expert consultation calls. Companies discussed in these calls are 15 percentage points more likely to receive financing in the following quarter. Positive signals about technology integration and customer acquisition increase deal likelihood by 14% and 10.5%, respectively, with their predictive power declining by over 75% for mature companies. Market analysis and business strategy discussions – comprising over 40% of call content—show minimal predictive power for investment outcomes. Our findings document both how investors overcome information asymmetries in early-stage investing and a misalignment between the information they seek and the information that predicts investment outcomes. Methodologically, we demonstrate the potential of LLMs to extract nuanced insights from complex qualitative data. |
| 9:00am - 9:30am | Session 3.01: ESG Metrics in Executive Compensation: a Multitasking Approach Location: Mikado Conference hall |
|
|
ESG Metrics in Executive Compensation: a Multitasking Approach 1: Georgia State University, United States of America; 2: IE Business School, IE University, Madrid, Spain; 3: School of Industrial Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands We model the multitasking nature of managerial incentives when ESG metrics are |
| 9:00am - 9:30am | Session 4.01: More Than Meets the Eye (or Ear): Surprising Microstructure Effects of Fed Chair Nonverbal Cues in High-Frequency Markets Location: Tosca Conference hall |
|
|
More Than Meets the Eye (or Ear): Surprising Microstructure Effects of Fed Chair Nonverbal Cues in High-Frequency Markets Rutgers University, United States of America We investigate the second-by-second impact of Fed Chair Jerome Powell's facial and vocal emotional expressions during FOMC press conferences on the market microstructure of SPY and TLT ETFs. Using unique high-frequency multimodal data and robust wild cluster bootstrap inference, we find complex and often counterintuitive effects. Contrary to standard hypotheses, negative emotional cues (facial or vocal) predict significantly lower subsequent volatility, while positive facial expressions predict higher SPY volatility. Positive vocal cues improve TLT liquidity (narrower spreads), but negative vocal cues also predict narrower spreads at longer horizons. Significant interactions between nonverbal cues and textual sentiment reveal further complexity, such as congruent positive signals predicting lower TLT depth. The Treasury market appears more sensitive than the equity market. Our results challenge simple valence-based theories for high-frequency nonverbal cues, highlighting the importance of modality, asset class, microstructure dimension, and interactions with text in shaping immediate market dynamics. |
| 9:00am - 9:30am | Session 5.01: Challenge-building brainstorm Location: Nabucco Conference hall Moderator: Joanna Pousset, Demium, Spain Founders and academics team up to surface the newest, hottest, and most urgent fintech challenges. Real founder pain points are laid out, sharpened, and framed into high-impact prompts that set the stage for bold, innovation-ready solutions. |
| 9:30am - 10:00am | Session 1.02: Panel: "Communicating finance ideas I" Location: Aida Conference hall Moderator: David Stolin, Future Finance Fest (3f), United States of America Panelist: Ashwini Agrawal, LSE, United Kingdom Panelist: Linas Beliunas, Oscilar, Lithuania Panelist: Chris Crespo, Nordic Fintech Magazine, Denmark How can potentially complex financial ideas be communicated with clarity, credibility, and impact? abstract |
| 9:30am - 10:00am | Session 2.02: The Growth and Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Asset Management Location: Carmen Conference hall |
|
|
The Growth and Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Asset Management 1: University of Melbourne; 2: University of Texas at Austin; 3: Southern Methodist University We provide a comprehensive analysis of AI adoption across various aspects of asset management by examining U.S. registered investment advisers. Since 2017, the investment advisory industry has seen significant AI adoption, primarily for investment strategies and IT infrastructure, while generative AI adoption remained minimal until 2023. AI adoption varies substantially across advisers and is related to the size and composition of advisers’ assets under management, client base, and workforce. Advisers with larger assets, a higher share of hedge funds, and fewer employees directly interacting with individual clients exhibit higher levels of AI adoption. Moreover, we estimate that AI adoption leads to increased growth of the investment advisory business and a shift toward private funds, with spillover effects extending beyond hedge funds. Our findings underscore the heterogeneity of AI applications across the diverse funds and services in asset management. |
| 9:30am - 10:00am | Session 3.02: Political Influence on Green Innovation Location: Mikado Conference hall |
|
|
Political Influence on Green Innovation 1: National Taipei University of Technology; 2: Soochow University; 3: Oregon State University; 4: National Taiwan University of Seince and Technology This study investigates the impact of Regulation 18 on green innovation within Chinese firms. Introduced in 2013 to sever political ties in corporate governance, Regulation 18 mandated the resignation of government officials from business roles. Studying Chinese listed firms from 2010 to 2016, we utilize a difference-in-differences (DiD) model to evaluate its effects. Our findings reveal a significant influence of Regulation 18 on green innovation. Non-State-Owned Enterprises (non-SOEs) in High Energy Consumption, High Pollution, or Overcapacity (HHO) industries experienced reduced green innovation post-regulation, consistent with the legitimacy theory and social perspective, indicating a positive correlation between political connections and green innovation. Conversely, State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) in HHO industries exhibited increased green innovation, aligning with the resource curse theory and tunneling arguments, suggesting a negative correlation between political connections and green innovation. Furthermore, the analysis extends to corporate financial performance, revealing a decline for politically connected non-SOEs in HHO industries post-Regulation 18, while improvements are observed for SOEs in the same sector. |
| 9:30am - 10:00am | Session 4.02: Mandatory Central Clearing and Derivative Offsetting Location: Tosca Conference hall |
|
|
Mandatory Central Clearing and Derivative Offsetting Audencia Business School, France Exploiting the adoption of mandatory central clearing by U.S. regulators, we explore the effects of this regulatory reform on banks’ derivative offsetting. Using a triple-difference testing procedure, we find that derivative offsetting increases (decreases) for banks with higher (lower) capital ratios after the adoption of mandatory central clearing, in comparison to the control group. The results are economically significant and robust to a variety of alternative measurements and tests. Our findings suggest banks with different target capital ratios respond to central clearing reform differently. |
| 9:30am - 10:00am | Session 5.02: Challenge-building brainstorm Location: Nabucco Conference hall Moderator: Joanna Pousset, Demium, Spain Founders and academics team up to surface the newest, hottest, and most urgent fintech challenges. Real founder pain points are laid out, sharpened, and framed into high-impact prompts that set the stage for bold, innovation-ready solutions. |
| 10:00am - 10:30am | Session 1.03: Panel: "Communicating finance ideas II" Location: Aida Conference hall Moderator: David Stolin, Future Finance Fest (3f), United States of America Panelist: Victor Lyonnet, University of Michigan, United States of America Panelist: Allan Mendelowitz, ACTUS Financial Research Foundation, United States of America Panelist: Christel Rendu de Lint, Vontobel, Switzerland How can potentially complex financial ideas be communicated with clarity, credibility, and impact? |
| 10:00am - 10:30am | Session 2.03: Is Generative AI an Existential Threat to Human Creatives? Insights from Financial Economics Location: Carmen Conference hall |
|
|
Is Generative AI an Existential Threat to Human Creatives? Insights from Financial Economics GMU With the phenomenal rise of generative AI models (e.g., large language models such as GPT or large image models such as Diffusion), there are increasing concerns about human creatives’ futures. Specifically, as generative models’ power further increases, will they eventually replace all human creatives’ jobs? We argue that the answer is “no,” even if existing generative AI models’ capabilities reach their theoretical limit. Our theory has a close analogy to a familiar insight in financial economics on the impossibility of an informationally efficient market [Grossman and Stiglitz (1980)]: If generative AI models can provide all the content humans need at low variable costs, then there is no incentive for humans to spend costly resources on content creation as they cannot profit from it. But if no human creates new content, then generative AI can only learn from stale information and be unable to generate up-to-date content that reflects new happenings in the physical world. This creates a paradox. |
| 10:00am - 10:30am | Session 3.03: Does Social Media Help Level the Playing Field in Director Labor Markets? Evidence from Twitter Location: Mikado Conference hall |
|
|
Does Social Media Help Level the Playing Field in Director Labor Markets? Evidence from Twitter 1: University of Mississippi, United States of America; 2: University of Alabama, United States of America We explore the director labor market consequences of social media use. Specifically, we identify directors in S&P 1500 firms who are active on Twitter and examine various director labor market outcomes. We find directors, particularly females and minorities, on Twitter are more likely to gain an additional directorship, a larger directorship and a directorship in a new industry each year than those who are not on Twitter. These results hold when controlling for time invariant unobserved director characteristics and when using an instrumental variable approach to control for endogeneity. They are strongest for directors, primarily females and minorities, who engage more with other directors via social media. Shareholders show more support for social-media-active directors through a greater (lesser) percentage of votes casts “For” (“Against”) their election and through a greater stock price reaction to the announcement of first-time director appointments. These results suggest that social media can play an important role in reducing traditional labor market frictions and facilitating more opportunities for minority and female directors. |
| 10:00am - 10:30am | Session 4.03: A Comprehensive Business Intelligence Analysis for Cryptocurrency Anomalies Detection Location: Tosca Conference hall |
|
|
A Comprehensive Business Intelligence Analysis for Cryptocurrency Anomalies Detection SCE Shamoon College of Engineering Cryptocurrencies exhibit high volatile behavior and observable anomaly effects, yet systematic anomaly detection within these markets remains underexplored. This study introduces a tailored Business Intelligence (BI) system for cryptocurrency anomaly detection. Leveraging advanced analytics and visualization, our novel BI system provides a comprehensive and real-time overview of market behaviors, enabling swift identification of cryptocurrency price anomalies. Our unique system empowers users to navigate the dynamic cryptocurrency trading, enhancing anomaly detection informed decision-making and risk management. |
| 10:00am - 10:30am | Session 5.03: Challenge-building brainstorm Location: Nabucco Conference hall Moderator: Joanna Pousset, Demium, Spain Founders and academics team up to surface the newest, hottest, and most urgent fintech challenges. Real founder pain points are laid out, sharpened, and framed into high-impact prompts that set the stage for bold, innovation-ready solutions. |
| 10:30am - 11:00am | Coffee 2: Coffee Location: Norma Conference hall |
| 11:00am - 11:30am | Session 1.04: Panel: "Payments" Location: Aida Conference hall Moderator: Andra Sonea, University of Warwick, United Kingdom Panelist: Christian Grothoff, Taler Systems SA, Switzerland Panelist: Alex Lakatos, Interledger Foundation, Romania |
| 11:00am - 11:30am | Session 2.04: "Smart" Contracts and External Financing Location: Carmen Conference hall |
|
|
"Smart" Contracts and External Financing McGill University, Canada Hash-linked timestamping is the key feature behind blockchain technology. It makes it possible to design financing contracts that are based on reliable and up-to-date records of transactions. For this reason, it is considered to enhance trust. This paper develops a theoretical model that uses dynamic contract theory to derive optimal financing contracts in a blockchain environment. I show that a dynamically adjusting profit sharing rule is optimal and I highlight properties that determine the splitting rule. In contrast to the view that blockchain enhances traditional contracts like debt and equity by bringing efficiency gains, I emphasise that blockchain allows borrowers to learn from data and take effoort decisions more frequently, which make debt and equity contracts costlier. |
| 11:00am - 11:30am | Session 3.04: The Unintended Consequences of Investing for the Long Run: Evidence from Target Date Funds Location: Mikado Conference hall |
|
|
The Unintended Consequences of Investing for the Long Run: Evidence from Target Date Funds 1: Michigan State University, United States of America; 2: INSEAD; 3: Villanova U; 4: CEPR We use Target Date Funds (TDFs) to study how managers of funds behave when shielded from their investors' short-term needs. We document that asset managers exploit reduced investor attention to deliver lower performance quantifiable in 21% for an average investor holding the fund for 50 years. This underperformance is driven by fund families using TDFs to smooth the flow shocks of affiliated open-end funds and to boost fees by investing in the affiliated expensive share classes. We use the Pension Protection Act of 2006 as an exogenous shock that made TDFs the default investment option within 401(k) retirement plans. |
| 11:00am - 11:30am | Session 5.04: Challenge-building brainstorm Location: Nabucco Conference hall Moderator: Joanna Pousset, Demium, Spain Founders and academics team up to surface the newest, hottest, and most urgent fintech challenges. Real founder pain points are laid out, sharpened, and framed into high-impact prompts that set the stage for bold, innovation-ready solutions. |
| 11:30am - 12:00pm | Session 1.05: Panel: "Future of money" Location: Aida Conference hall Moderator: Chris Crespo, Nordic Fintech Magazine, Denmark Panelist: Andrei Kirilenko, Cambridge Judge Business School, United Kingdom Panelist: Siddharth Shetty, Finternet, India Stablecoins, tokenized deposits, and CBDCs; issuance and market distribution models; successes and failures; regulatory regimes around the world. |
| 11:30am - 12:00pm | Session 2.05: Liquid staking Location: Carmen Conference hall |
|
|
Liquid staking 1: University of Calgary, Canada; 2: UC Berkeley; 3: London School of Economics Liquid staking allows agents to sell ownership of an illiquid claim to satisfy a liquidity need. We develop a model of liquid staking and characterize the effect of the secondary market on protocol stability. We establish that the liquid market has two effects: first, it allows agents to redeem illiquid assets and thus reduces run risk on the protocol, but also conveys information and can act as a coordination mechanism and increase market run risk. Using novel data on the Lido protocol, we present stylized facts on the staking market and relate our results to the design of digital deposits. |
| 11:30am - 12:00pm | Session 3.05: A Hierarchical State-Based Asset Pricing Model Location: Mikado Conference hall |
|
|
A Hierarchical State-Based Asset Pricing Model Université Toulouse Capitole, Toulouse Business School Research Centre The exponential growth and variety of studies on returns highlights the lack of comprehensive asset pricing theory for explicitly explaining the empirical data. The paper addresses this challenge by proposing a hierarchical state-based asset pricing model based on two interconnected solutions: the state space of assets and explanatory gain decomposition approach. As a result, the states of assets extend the conventional state of nature for bringing fundamental and macroeconomic characteristics into existing asset pricing models. Then, the decomposition approach tackles the complexity and heterogeneity of asset pricing by advancing all-in analyses with hierarchical piecewise finer-grained regressions. The direction is demonstrated with a multi-step analysis subsequently boosting the explanatory power of regressions between price-to-fundamental ratios and asset quality characteristics and resolving the weak correlation between the HML and RMW factors. Furthermore, the proposed model establishes a direct link between theory and empirics encompassing multi-dimensional data and growing stack of data science techniques. |
| 11:30am - 12:00pm | Session 5.05: Challenge-building brainstorm Location: Nabucco Conference hall Moderator: Joanna Pousset, Demium, Spain Founders and academics team up to surface the newest, hottest, and most urgent fintech challenges. Real founder pain points are laid out, sharpened, and framed into high-impact prompts that set the stage for bold, innovation-ready solutions. |
| 12:00pm - 12:30pm | Session 1.06: Panel: "Fintech lending" Location: Aida Conference hall Moderator: Tibor Zavadil, DigFin, a.s., Slovak Republic Panelist: Virginia Gianinazzi, Nova SBE, Portugal Panelist: Tymon Zastrzeżyński, Loando Group, Poland |
| 12:00pm - 12:30pm | Session 2.06: On the Incentive Compatibility of Optimistic Blockchain Mechanisms Location: Carmen Conference hall |
|
|
On the Incentive Compatibility of Optimistic Blockchain Mechanisms GMU To support a growing financial system, many recent blockchain innovations (e.g., layer-2 scaling solutions, proof-of-stake layer-1 chains, cross-chain interoperability bridges, and data availability layers, etc.) adopt an “optimistic” design principle, that is, the system proceeds as if all participants are well-behaving, presumably sustained by some “stake-and-slash” mechanisms. We formulate the logic behind such optimistic systems in a simple game and characterize its equilibria. We point out that the “optimistic” assumption under current designs is not compatible with all participants being rational. Therefore, to ensure security, protocol designers have to impose trust assumptions regarding the presence of altruistic participants. We explore alternative design changes that may help alleviate the identified problems, including introducing redistribution across participants or adopting succinct proof-based designs. |
| 12:00pm - 12:30pm | Session 3.06: Forecasting Stock Prices with a News-Based Model Location: Mikado Conference hall |
|
|
Forecasting Stock Prices with a News-Based Model NYU Tandon School, United States of America It is assumed in the news-based model of stock pricing (NBSPM) that stock prices are determined with macroeconomic news (modeled with the total market return in the spirit of CAPM), industry news (modeled with the relevant industry ETF returns), and the company-specific news and momentum that are described using an optimal ARMA-GARCH model. In this work, the NBSPM accuracy for forecasting stock prices is compared with that of the momentum-enhanced five-factor Fama-French model. The results for a representative list of holdings of nine major US equity sector ETFs demonstrates superiority of the NBSPM in most cases. |
| 12:00pm - 12:30pm | Session 5.06: Challenge-building brainstorm Location: Nabucco Conference hall Moderator: Joanna Pousset, Demium, Spain Founders and academics team up to surface the newest, hottest, and most urgent fintech challenges. Real founder pain points are laid out, sharpened, and framed into high-impact prompts that set the stage for bold, innovation-ready solutions. |
| 12:30pm - 2:00pm | Lunch 1: Lunch Location: Dining hall |
| 2:00pm - 2:30pm | Session 1.07: Panel: "Tokenization I" Location: Aida Conference hall Moderator: Aadil Bundeally, BABL AI, Valutico & AI Risk, United Kingdom Panelist: Sven-Roger Baron von Schilling, svs Capital Partners GmbH, Germany Panelist: Jiasun Li, United States of America Panelist: Martynas Pilkis, Axiology, Lithuania Panelist: Stefan Scharnowski, University of Mannheim, Germany |
| 2:00pm - 2:30pm | Session 2.07: Behavioural Foundations of Individual Cryptocurrency Adoption (Evidence from the Nordic countries and France) Location: Carmen Conference hall |
|
|
Behavioural Foundations of Individual Cryptocurrency Adoption (Evidence from the Nordic countries and France) 1: Rennes School of Business, France; 2: King's College London, UK This presentation synthesises evidence from several new survey-based studies (supported by Nasdaq N.F.) that cover more than 2,300 individual investors in Denmark, Finland, Sweden and France, in order to explain why, how and for whom cryptocurrencies are attractive. The combined findings reveal multiple behavioural channels, i.e., demographics, memory accuracy, interpersonal and institutional trust, gendered knowledge gaps in risk perception, promotion-versus-prevention motivation, and values-based beliefs, that jointly determine adoption and price expectations in a market where traditional fundamentals are weak, offering academics new micro-foundations for expectation-formation models. |
| 2:00pm - 2:30pm | Session 3.07: An Analytical Model for Loan Commitments Facing the Material Adverse Change Location: Mikado Conference hall |
|
|
An Analytical Model for Loan Commitments Facing the Material Adverse Change The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel We propose a new analytical model for the valuation of loan commitments and some of their main features including the MAC (Material Adverse Change) clause. A two-period contingent claims approach in continuous time is developed. The advantage of this approach is that it is based on rational economic considerations that are not based on utility functions. |
| 2:00pm - 2:30pm | Session 4.07: Optimal Portfolios for Socially Responsible Investors Location: Tosca Conference hall |
|
|
Using Net-Zero Alignment Strength for Sustainable Portfolio Choice 1: University College London; 2: Lombard Odier Investment Management; 3: Tandon School of Engineering, New York University We offer a new metric, "net-zero alignment strength" (NZAS), which can be used by socially responsible investors for portfolio selection. NZAS is based on the current corporate GHG emission intensity (EI) and its reduction rate (ERR) and, hence, can be used for choosing among the companies with high EI and high ERR versus the companies with low EI and low ERR. We have incorporated NZAS into the mean-variance portfolio (MVP) framework, which yields simultaneous optimization upon high returns and NZAS, and low price volatility. The NZAS contribution to the MVP minimization function is controlled by the net-zero commitment parameter, which is investor’s choice. An example for a portfolio with 29 major constituents of the Energy sector illustrates an interplay between the company Sharpe ratios and NZAS, which determines the effects of the net-zero commitment on the major portfolio holdings. We suggest to use this framework for finding the best-in-class companies within the chosen equity sectors. |
| 2:00pm - 2:30pm | Session 5.07: Ideas development Location: Nabucco Conference hall Moderator: Joanna Pousset, Demium, Spain Mixed teams of founders, academics, and regulators form around the hottest challenges. They sprint through concept pods, test assumptions, and unlock unconventional angles under time pressure. |
| 2:30pm - 3:00pm | Session 1.08: Panel: "Tokenization II" Location: Aida Conference hall Moderator: Aadil Bundeally, BABL AI, Valutico & AI Risk, United Kingdom Panelist: Sven-Roger Baron von Schilling, svs Capital Partners GmbH, Germany Panelist: Jiasun Li, United States of America Panelist: Martynas Pilkis, Axiology, Lithuania Panelist: Stefan Scharnowski, University of Mannheim, Germany |
| 2:30pm - 3:00pm | Session 2.08: Tracing the learning curve: On cryptocurrency prices, volatility, and eventual adoption Location: Carmen Conference hall |
|
|
Tracing the learning curve: On cryptocurrency prices, volatility, and eventual adoption University of Oxford Public debate about cryptocurrency reveals strong and disparate opinions on potential adoption. The paper argues that this uncertainty is the driving factor of cryptocurrency prices. In the model presented, uncertainty about a cryptocurrency's eventual adoption demand amount leads to a discounted cryptocurrency price. However, over time, investors learn about the likely extent of eventual adoption, and the discount reduces. The model replicates the long-term decline in price growth rates and variance of Bitcoin and other major cryptocurrencies. The model can forecast expected price growth and variance conditional on low interim adoption, providing guidance to cryptocurrency allocation sizing within an investment portfolio. The model also estimates the probability distribution of a cryptocurrency's extent of eventual adoption. |
| 2:30pm - 3:00pm | Session 3.08: Intangible Liabilities Location: Mikado Conference hall |
|
|
Intangible Liabilities 1: EDHEC Business School, France; 2: KU Leuven When liabilities are deemed improbable or cannot be reliably estimated by management, they are not recorded on the balance sheet. Instead, they are disclosed qualitatively in the company's filings. Examples include obligations related to pending or future lawsuits, product liability, environmental matters, false advertising, or patent and copyright infringements. We refer to these obligations as intangible liabilities (IL). We construct a firm-level, text-based measure of IL. IL is positively related to firm size, volatility, and share turnover, and is negatively correlated with accounting performance, abnormal returns, and Tobin’s Q. IL also predictably varies across industries. Moreover, IL predicts future lawsuits against firms and the future deterioration of their reputations. Companies with higher IL trade at lower valuation ratios and have significantly higher future crash risks. A portfolio that is long on high IL and short on low IL yields an annual abnormal return of 3% after accounting for common factors. Overall, the results suggest that intangible liabilities are a significant determinant of firm value and stock returns. |
| 2:30pm - 3:00pm | Session 4.08: Tradefeedr: Empowering Data-Driven Trading Decisions Location: Tosca Conference hall |
|
|
Tradefeedr: Empowering Data-Driven Trading Decisions Tradefeedr, United Kingdom Tradefeedr applies the principles of open banking APIs to financial markets, reducing the friction of data sharing between market participants. Through a unified, secure analytics API connected to over 20 major liquidity providers (LPs) and 10 trading platforms, we provide a single data agreement that covers all participants. Our standardized data, metrics, and analysis empower trading teams, while independent client reporting for LPs and bilateral client–LP data dialogue foster transparency and collaboration. Access to this unique dataset enables market participants to unlock the full value of their data and leverage AI and machine learning to make smarter trading decisions. Everything we do is driven by the needs of the trading community. |
| 2:30pm - 3:00pm | Session 5.08: Ideas development Location: Nabucco Conference hall Moderator: Joanna Pousset, Demium, Spain Mixed teams of founders, academics, and regulators form around the hottest challenges. They sprint through concept pods, test assumptions, and unlock unconventional angles under time pressure. |
| 3:00pm - 3:30pm | Session 1.09: Panel: "What is Revenue Operations (RevOps) and why is it important for financial services?" Location: Aida Conference hall Moderator: Sheila Mitham, Inbound FinTech, United Kingdom Panelist: David Stolin, Future Finance Fest (3f), United States of America Panelist: Ignas Zimaitis, Vilnius university, Lithuania A fireside chat about marketing in fintech with Sheila Mitham, CEO of Inbound FinTech |
| 3:00pm - 3:30pm | Session 2.09: Aggregate Confusion In Crypto Market Data Location: Carmen Conference hall |
|
|
Aggregate Confusion In Crypto Market Data 1: Santa Clara University, United States of America; 2: Indicia Labs, United States of America The quality of cryptocurrency market data is critical for academic research and financial applications, yet the topic remains understudied. We analyze data from leading vendors and document pervasive mislabeling, measurement errors, and discrepancies in reported market metrics. To address these issues, we propose a novel aggregation methodology that achieves asymptotic accuracy by identifying unreliable data instances. We also introduce a data quality grading system, offering practical guidance for data consumers. Our findings underscore the risks of relying on a single provider. They highlight a possible need for regulation in the market for crypto data. |
| 3:00pm - 3:30pm | Session 3.09: Operating Leverage and Risk Premium Location: Mikado Conference hall |
|
|
Operating Leverage and Risk Premium 1: MIT; 2: UT Dallas, United States of America; 3: BI Norwegian Business School We introduce an out-of-sample neural-network-based measure of firm-level operating leverage, which outperforms existing ones in capturing the elasticity of operating profits to gross profits. Strikingly, our analysis uncovers a non-monotonic—and potentially negative—relationship between operating leverage and the risk premium. This challenges conventional wisdom and contradicts explanations that link operating leverage to the value premium. A production-based asset pricing model incorporating both variable and fixed costs provides a possible rationale for these empirical findings. Furthermore, our analysis offers a fresh perspective on the idiosyncratic volatility premium by emphasizing the interplay between the operating hedge effect induced by variable costs and the operating leverage effect induced by fixed costs. |
| 3:00pm - 3:30pm | Session 4.09: Bridging Asia and Europe: Japan’s Next-Generation FinTech Ecosystem & Cross-Border Collaboration Opportunities Location: Tosca Conference hall |
|
|
Bridging Asia and Europe: Japan’s Next-Generation FinTech Ecosystem & Cross-Border Collaboration Opportunities Fintech Association of Japan, Japan Japan’s FinTech sector has undergone a rapid transformation in the past five years, driven by progressive open-banking rules, a vibrant Web3 start-up scene, and a public-private push toward cashless payments ahead of Expo 2025 Osaka-Kansai. Representing 500+ member firms, the Fintech Association of Japan (FAJ) will share fresh data on investment flows, consumer adoption, and regulatory sandboxes that enable speedy experimentation without compromising consumer protection. Building on this evidence, the session explores how Japanese and European innovators can co-create next-generation payment rails, tokenized capital-market pilots, and inclusive digital-finance programmes. By highlighting flexible regulatory pathways, reciprocal sandbox access, and practical partnership models—rather than focusing on any single legislative regime—the talk offers a future-oriented roadmap for policymakers, founders, and investors eager to scale solutions across Asia-Europe corridors. |
| 3:00pm - 3:30pm | Session 5.09: Ideas development Location: Nabucco Conference hall Moderator: Joanna Pousset, Demium, Spain Mixed teams of founders, academics, and regulators form around the hottest challenges. They sprint through concept pods, test assumptions, and unlock unconventional angles under time pressure. |
| 3:30pm - 4:00pm | Coffee 3: Coffee Location: Norma Conference hall |
| 4:00pm - 4:30pm | Session 1.10: Panel: "Lithuania, a fintech powerhouse: Hows, whys, and nexts" Location: Aida Conference hall Moderator: Skaiste Budbergyte-Zabielaite, CEO, Lithuania Panelist: Laura Guobužaitė, Fintech Lithuania at INFOBALT, Lithuania Panelist: Greta Ranonytė, FINTECH HUB LT, association, Lithuania Panelist: Deimante Zemgulyte, Invest Lithuania, Lithuania |
| 4:00pm - 4:30pm | Session 2.10: Market Power and the Bitcoin Protocol Location: Carmen Conference hall |
|
|
Market Power and the Bitcoin Protocol 1: University of Calgary, Canada; 2: UC Berkeley We document that blocks on the blockchain are rarely filled to capacity, even though |
| 4:00pm - 4:30pm | Session 3.10: The Private Value of Open-Source Innovation Location: Mikado Conference hall |
|
|
The Private Value of Open-Source Innovation 1: Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University; 2: School of Management, University at Buffalo We investigate open-source innovation by public firms and the private value it generates for these firms. Unlike patents, which grant inventors exclusive rights to their inventions, open-source innovations can be used by anyone. Nevertheless, using an extensive dataset of public-firm activity on GitHub, we find that firms with open-source projects represent 68% of the U.S.~stock market across 86% of industries. We estimate the private value of all projects in our sample to be nearly $25 billion, with the average project generating $842,000. We find that projects with fully permissive licenses are generally less valuable and firms facing higher competition tend to generate less private value from their projects. We also find that the degree to which a project complements commercial products is not a primary driver of private value. Finally, open-source value is associated with a firm's substantial growth in terms of sales, profits, employment, and patenting, yet it also induces creative destruction. These results contribute to our understanding of the private value generated by innovation in the absence of legal excludability. |
| 4:00pm - 4:30pm | Session 4.10: The Response of Debtors to Rate Changes Location: Tosca Conference hall |
|
|
The Response of Debtors to Rate Changes 1: Nova SBE, Portugal; 2: Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL); 3: Goethe University Frankfurt; 4: University of Chicago Booth School of Business How borrowers respond to future changes in the interest rate on their debt is of crucial importance for the transmission of monetary policy and for financial stability. Combining data from a large bank, a letter RCT, and an online survey, we study this question in the context of the German mortgage market, where borrowers face high interest rates since 2022 when their rate fixation period ends. We find that borrowers take various actions to reduce the impact of higher rates on interest payments. Survey responses indicate high awareness of the evolution of interest rates and corroborate a strong propensity to prepare for the rate reset, which we show experimentally is sensitive to the size of the rate increase and to the distance from reset. Our letter intervention does not affect rate beliefs, consistent with high ex-ante knowledge, but increases awareness of available options and the desire to prepare. Ongoing tracking will reveal whether this awareness translates into actual behavior. |
| 4:00pm - 4:30pm | Session 5.10: Ideas development Location: Nabucco Conference hall Moderator: Joanna Pousset, Demium, Spain Mixed teams of founders, academics, and regulators form around the hottest challenges. They sprint through concept pods, test assumptions, and unlock unconventional angles under time pressure. |
| 4:30pm - 5:00pm | Session 1.11: Panel: "Green Finance" Location: Aida Conference hall Moderator: Andra Sonea, University of Warwick, United Kingdom Panelist: Antonio Gargano, University of Houston, United States of America Panelist: Virginija Gecaite, European Investment Bank, Lithuania Panelist: Nora Laurinaityte, Lithuania Green Finance Institute, Lithuania Panelist: Anatoly Schmidt, NYU Tandon School, United States of America |
| 4:30pm - 5:00pm | Session 2.11: A Theory Model of Digital Currency with Asymmetric Privacy Location: Carmen Conference hall |
|
|
A Theory Model of Digital Currency with Asymmetric Privacy McGill University, Canada This paper considers introducing asymmetric privacy in the design of central bank digital currencies (CBDC) and digital currencies more generally, to preserve the privacy of money spent while keeping the benefits of digital records for money received. It is shown that this feature would help minimize real distortions between consumers, firms, and financiers, while enabling tax optimization and better access to external financing. Protecting the privacy of consumers is desirable from a welfare and efficiency standpoint as long as there exist noticeable privacy concerns. Implementing asymmetric privacy is technologically feasible, using for instance Zero-Knowledge proofs or other privacy tools. |
| 4:30pm - 5:00pm | Session 3.11: The Different Networks Of Firms Implied By The News Location: Mikado Conference hall |
|
|
The Different Networks Of Firms Implied By The News 1: Santa Clara University, United States of America; 2: Wellington Management, United States of America The interconnectedness of firms through various networks, such as production, credit, and competition, plays a critical role in determining firm-level and aggregate outcomes. However, data on these connections are often limited. This paper introduces a novel artificial intelligence methodology that extracts explicit firm relationship networks from financial news articles, providing comprehensive and interpretable data across multiple dimensions. Applying this methodology to New York Times articles since 1981, we generate extensive networks that predict key macroeconomic indicators. Our publicly accessible dataset offers valuable insights for future research on firm networks and aggregate fluctuations. |
| 4:30pm - 5:00pm | Session 4.11: What is an Effective Signal in Crowdfunding? Evidence from Expert Researchers and a Meta-Study Location: Tosca Conference hall |
|
|
What is an Effective Signal in Crowdfunding? Evidence from Expert Researchers and a Meta-Study 1: Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; 2: University of Bremen, Germany What is an effective signal in crowdfunding? We asked this question to 83 expert researchers who have published the top-notch articles in this field. They stated that, in theory, strong signals include past crowdfunding success, business experience, patent ownership, and the equity share offered. Examining 145 articles published in leading business and economics journals, we find that the empirical evidence from a meta-analysis does not accord with this perception among expert researchers. Signals that expert researchers consider to be theoretically less strong are more often statistically significant predictors of crowdfunding success and have neither larger nor smaller standardized effect sizes than strong signals. A meta-regression suggests that domain-specific signals play the most important role in crowdfunding. The findings of our literature review provide important insights for investors, platform managers, and the academic review process. |
| 4:30pm - 5:00pm | Session 5.11: Ideas development Location: Nabucco Conference hall Moderator: Joanna Pousset, Demium, Spain Mixed teams of founders, academics, and regulators form around the hottest challenges. They sprint through concept pods, test assumptions, and unlock unconventional angles under time pressure. |
| 5:00pm - 5:30pm | Session 1.12: Panel: "Natural language processing in financial services" Location: Aida Conference hall Moderator: David Stolin, Future Finance Fest (3f), United States of America Panelist: Francisco Webber, Cortical.io, Austria |
| 5:00pm - 5:30pm | Session 2.12: Behavior on Blockchains: Trading Activity in Tokenized Financial Assets Location: Carmen Conference hall |
|
|
Behavior on Blockchains: Trading Activity in Tokenized Financial Assets University of Mannheim, Germany This paper analyzes trading patterns and investor behavior in the market for tokenized |
| 5:00pm - 5:30pm | Session 3.12: Economic Drivers of Investor Search Behavior in Financial Information Markets Location: Mikado Conference hall |
|
|
Economic Drivers of Investor Search Behavior in Financial Information Markets Universidad EAFIT, Colombia This paper analyzes investor search behavior across financial information providers by modeling demand within a multi-class classification framework. Examining searches on Bloomberg Terminals and EDGAR, I explore how subscription prices, expected stock returns, and investor income influence the selection of financial data sources. The findings offer insights into information-seeking behavior, retrieval patterns, and access dynamics, highlighting the economic factors that drive the use of proprietary and open-access financial platforms. |
| 5:00pm - 5:30pm | Session 4.12: Is Love Blind? AI-Powered Trading with Emotional Dividends Location: Tosca Conference hall |
|
|
Is Love Blind? AI-Powered Trading with Emotional Dividends 1: Arizona State University, United States of America; 2: Yuan Ze University; 3: National University of Singapore This study exploits the non-fungible token (NFT) setting to estimate the value of non-pecuniary benefits, a long- standing empirical challenge in private-value markets such as art, antiques, and other collectibles. After developing and validating our emotional dividend proxy (LOVE), we apply deep learning algorithms and discover that contemporaneous price fluctuations, certain collection features, and ownership wealth significantly contribute to its formation. Leveraging these parameters, we employ AI-powered models to estimate NFT prices with high accuracy, but find their predictive ability is decreasing in LOVE. Additionally, we demonstrate that LOVE-driven trading results in long-term financial losses for the average investor, highlighting a trade-off between wealth and emotional utility. Our study pro- vides novel economic insights into the factors shaping emotional dividends and their role in the pricing of private-value assets. It also surfaces the limitations AI faces in emotionally charged markets, revealing new challenges for algorithmic trading when assets carry significant emotional utility. |
| 5:00pm - 5:30pm | Session 5.12: Ideas development Location: Nabucco Conference hall Moderator: Joanna Pousset, Demium, Spain Mixed teams of founders, academics, and regulators form around the hottest challenges. They sprint through concept pods, test assumptions, and unlock unconventional angles under time pressure. |
| 5:30pm - 7:00pm | Dinner 2: Dinner Location: Dining hall |
| 7:00pm - 7:30pm | Keynote 3: Keynote: "The promise of digital finance: Greater transparency, enhanced efficiency, and more effective and less burdensome regulation" Location: Aida Conference hall Moderator: Allan Mendelowitz, ACTUS Financial Research Foundation, United States of America |
| 7:30pm - 8:00pm | Plen. panel 3: Plenary panel: "Finance for the common good" Location: Aida Conference hall Moderator: Aadil Bundeally, BABL AI, Valutico & AI Risk, United Kingdom Panelist: Vladimir Atanasov, College of William and Mary, United States of America Panelist: Virginija Gecaite, European Investment Bank, Lithuania Panelist: Allan Mendelowitz, ACTUS Financial Research Foundation, United States of America Panelist: Siddharth Shetty, Finternet, India |
| 8:00pm - 8:30pm | Debrief - Tuesday: Announcements, housekeeping, reflections Location: Aida Conference hall |
