Conference Agenda
The sessions of the sections are highlighted in blue, those of the mini-symposia in yellow.
Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. If you click the selected day again, you return to the agenda overview.
You can also filter by sections or mini-symposia (topics). Please select a single session for detailed view with abstracts.
As participant you can create your own personal agenda. To do so, log into your account first. Then go to the agenda and click on the plus symbol to add sessions to your personal agenda.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||
LO2: Learning Operators and surrogate models using scientific machine learning
Session Topics: Learning Operators and surrogate models using scientific machine learning
| ||
| Presentations | ||
Low-rank surrogates for parametric PDEs 1: Universität Heidelberg, Germany; 2: University of Bath, UK
Evaluating the forward solution operator for parametric partial differential
equations (PDEs) typically involves solving large linear systems, making the
process computationally expensive.
Operator surrogates aim to provide a computationally efficient approximation to
these parameter-to-solution operators.
This is particularly beneficial in applications requiring many evaluations of
the forward map, such as uncertainty quantification (UQ) or optimization.
Mathematically, operator surrogates provide approximations of mappings between infinite dimensional spaces. We analyze an encoder-decoder framework, where the input and output function spaces are parametrized using coefficient sequences of admissable representation systems. The goal then becomes to approximate a coefficient-to-coefficient map, which can be realized using various approximation tools. In the present work we focus on low-rank tensor representation using the tensor-train (TT) format. This format allows for efficient storage, evaluation and basic linear algebra as long as the tensor ranks remain low. Its structure also allows for efficient quadrature, useful e.g.\ in UQ applications. We show approximation rates with regards to the storage complexity of such TT surrogates for certain holomorphic maps by providing rank bounds. Additionally, we present benchmark results comparing the TT surrogate to a range of other operator surrogate methods applied to a parametric diffusion problem with varying input smoothness. Deep Embedded Multiplicative DMD for Algebra-Preserving Koopman Learning 1: Imperial College London, United Kingdom; 2: Cambdrige University, United Kingdom Koopman theory turns nonlinear dynamics into a linear spectral problem. In computation, however, everything depends on a hard finite-dimensional choice: the observables must be expressive, nearly invariant under the dynamics, and, ideally, compatible with composition. Deep Koopman methods learn flexible coordinates, whereas structure-preserving methods enforce operator identities on fixed dictionaries. We combine these ideas by introducing Deep Embedded Multiplicative Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DeepMDMD), a method that learns a latent space and a partition of it, while enforcing the Koopman product rule as an exact algebraic constraint. Training alternates between an exact multiplicative operator update and a differentiable latent-clustering step that promotes Koopman closure. The result is a finite transition map on learned latent cells. Its nonzero spectrum lies on the unit circle, its dictionary is shaped by the dynamics rather than by ambient geometry, and forecasts are made in latent coordinates before being decoded to physical space. Across Hamiltonian, chaotic, and fluid examples, DeepMDMD learns dictionaries that are far more compact and dynamically coherent than those produced by geometric MDMD partitions. It reduces spectral pollution, reveals richer continuous-spectrum structure, and gives stable forecasts under severe noise. In high-dimensional flows, including a 158,624-dimensional cylinder wake and a noisy $\mathrm{Re}=20,000$ lid-driven cavity, it preserves coherent structures and long-time spectral statistics where state-space MDMD fails. Non-linear eigenvalue problems 1: ISTA (Institute of Science and Technology Austria), Austria; 2: University of Cambridge, UK; 3: University of Bath, UK; 4: UCL (University College London), UK The computation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors is a cornerstone of linear algebra, with profound applications across science and engineering. The power method and the inverse power method are classical iterative algorithms designed to find the largest and the smallest eigenvalue respectively. In recent years, many problems in fields such as machine learning, data science, and image analysis have led to non-linear analogues of eigenvalue problems. | ||



